Head-to-Head Comparison

OpenVoice vs Bark (Suno)

Compare OpenVoice and Bark (Suno) side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

O

OpenVoice

4.1/5
open-source

Open-source instant voice cloning with cross-lingual capabilities.

B

Bark (Suno)

4/5
open-source

Open-source text-to-audio model that generates speech, music, and sound effects.

Feature Comparison

FeatureOpenVoiceBark (Suno)
Rating
4.1/54/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
6+13+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

OpenVoice

Pros

  • • Instant voice cloning
  • • Cross-lingual capabilities
  • • Separate style control
  • • MIT licensed
  • • Active community

Cons

  • • Requires technical setup
  • • Quality varies by use case
  • • GPU requirements

Bark (Suno)

Pros

  • • Completely free and open-source
  • • Can generate music and sounds
  • • Unique emotional capabilities
  • • Active community
  • • No API restrictions

Cons

  • • Requires significant GPU resources
  • • Inconsistent voice quality
  • • No commercial support
  • • Can be slow without optimization

Other Comparisons

OpenVoice vs Coqui
OpenVoice vs Fish Audio
OpenVoice vs ElevenLabs

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.